Investment firm pays record fine for violations during Baker Hughes-Halliburton merger

ValueAct Capital, an investment firm, has agreed to pay a $11 million settlement for violating the premerger reporting violations related to the now failed Halliburton-Baker Hughes merger.

World’s second and third largest oilfield services providers Halliburton and Baker Hughes in November 2014 said they were planning to merge in a deal valued at $35 billion.

The U.S. justice department said on Tuesday that, following the merger plan announcement, ValueAct bought over $2.5 billion of Halliburton and Baker Hughes voting shares without complying with the HSR Act’s notification requirements.

According to a complaint filed on April 4, 2016 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, ValueAct acquired these shares „with the intent to influence the companies’ business decisions – including decisions related to the merger – and therefore could not rely on the limited “investment-only” exemption to the HSR Act’s notification requirements.”

The HSR Act definition by the Department of Justice says that the act imposes notification and waiting period requirements for transactions meeting certain size thresholds to ensure that such transactions undergo premerger antitrust review by the department and the Federal Trade Commission.

ValueAct has been reported to have used its access to senior executives of both Halliburton and Baker Hughes to attempt to influence the companies’ proposed merger and other aspects of their businesses. Halliburton and Baker Hughes abandoned their proposed merger on May 2.

Halliburton and Baker Hughes abandoned their proposed merger on May 2, 2016, after the Antitrust Division sued to block it in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

As part of the settlement announced by the U.S. Department of Justice, ValueAct agreed to pay a record $11 million.

The highest fine previously paid for an HSR violation was $5.67 million. ValueAct is also enjoined from relying on the “investment-only” exemption when it intends to influence, or is considering influencing, certain basic business decisions, including those relating to merger and acquisition strategy, corporate restructuring, and the company’s pricing, production capacity, or production output, the Department of Justice said.

Share this article

Follow Offshore Energy Today

Events>

<< Sep 2019 >>
MTWTFSS
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6

Africa Oil & Power 2019

The Africa Oil & Power conference will bring together an elite class of ministers and senior-level government…

read more >

OWI LATAM 2019

Over the two-day conference, 25+ expert speakers will share exclusive insight on how to develop an integrity, production and P&A strategy…

read more >

Uganda International Oil and Gas Summit 2019

Uganda International Oil & Gas Summit will once again examine the industry’s developments…

read more >

Argentina Oil and Gas Expo 2019

The Argentine Oil and Gas Institute (IAPG) organizes the Argentina Oil & Gas Expo bringing together the most…

read more >

Jobs>

Looking to fill a job opening?

By advertising your job here, on the homepage of OffshoreEnergyToday.com, you'll reach countless professionals in the sector. For more information, click below...

apply

Looking to fill a job opening?

By advertising your job here, on the homepage of OffshoreEnergyToday.com, you'll reach countless professionals in the sector. For more information, click below...

apply